When
researching my reviews, I like to visit the brewery’s website and read their
story. Most breweries, like Theoretically Brewing, have the same basic story.
Two friends get together with a love for home brewing. After growing their home
brewery beyond the capacity of their own kitchen, the next step is often to
open a brewery. In 2015 Kris Fischer and Kelti Baird opened what would be
Lethbridge’s first microbrewery in December, 2015.
Since the turn of the century, a new
element has come into the origin story of many craft breweries. That new
element comes in the form of environmental sustainability. Instead of sending
spent grain to the landfill for example, Theoretically brewing has found a
couple ways to keep grain from going to waste there. One option is to send
their spent grain to local farmers where it can be used as cattle feed. Another
option is to send grain to Lethbridge bio/gas where it gets converted to
methane gas.
Owners of Theoretically Brewing
report that none of their grain has gone to the landfill with nearly 30,000 kg
of grain being recycled. Frequency Hopper pours into my glass medium amber in
color with rusty highlights. Overall, looking like peach jam in a glass. The
head is dense, tightly packed, and cream colored.
Frequency
Hopper’s aroma is up front malt and hops. Malt is a combination of fresh baked
bread and caramel. Maltiness leads into a center that is mostly ripe, juicy
American hops. There’s also an herbaceous, leafy quality that seems slightly
out of place. It’s not entirely unpleasant, it just doesn’t add anything to the
proceedings, as it were. The finish at least has a slightly piney hop aroma to
it.
Taking a sip,
Frequency Hopper is medium bodied and smooth. There’s something going on with
the flavor I’m not sure what to make of, though. Frequency Hopper has an up
front juiciness that reminds me of some sort of tropical fruit punch. Subtle,
not overpowering at all, but present nonetheless. Unfortunately, I don’t taste
any significant malt profile. Too bad, because some malt might add structure
and depth to the beer’s overall juiciness. Instead, the flavor profile just
moves into a hoppy finish that’s not much more than more pacific northwest
hops.
Overall, I’m
giving Frequency Hopper a 6.25 out of 10. The flavor profile just doesn’t have
any depth to it. Also, I’m not sure what to make of the leafy quality I found
in the nose. It’s almost as though Theoretically Brewing wanted to put their
own spin on the American IPA but didn’t approach that spin with any coherent
plan of attack. It’s too bad, because for my money the whole beer suffered for
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment